World J Nephrol Urol
World Journal of Nephrology and Urology, ISSN 1927-1239 print, 1927-1247 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, World J Nephrol Urol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.wjnu.org

Case Report

Volume 2, Number 1, June 2013, pages 25-28


Xanthogranulomatous Prostatitis Presenting as a Prostatic Abscess: Case Report and Review of Literature

Purnendu Majumdara, b, Stephen McSorleya, Imran Ahmada, Ian B. Dunna

aDepartment of Urology, Monklands District General Hospital, Monkscourt Avenue, Airdrie, North Lanarkshire, ML6 0JS, United Kingdom
bCorresponding author: Purnendu Majumdar, Department of Urology, Monklands District General Hospital, Monkscourt Avenue, Airdrie, ML6 0JS, United Kingdom

Manuscript accepted for publication May 3, 2013
Short title: Xanthogranulomatous Prostatitis Presenting as Prostatic Abscess
doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/wjnu89w

Abstract▴Top 

Xanthogranulomatous inflammation of the prostate presenting as a prostatic abscess is rare, and we present what we believe to be only the second such case report in the literature. A review of literature related to prostatic abscess as well as xanthogranulomatous inflammation in general is also presented.

Keywords: Prostatic abscess; Xanthogranulomatous inflammation; Differential diagnosis

Introduction▴Top 

The exact aetiology of a xanthogranulomatous type of inflammation is unknown. Different organs may be affected, and pathologically there is tissue destruction along with an infiltrate of plasma cells and lymphocytes, surrounded by typically foamy (lipid-laden) macrophages [1]. Clinically it may mimic prostate malignancy.

Immunosuppression, diabetes as well as urethral instrumentation are important predisposing factors in patients developing prostatic abscess. Drainage of prostatic abscesses can be achieved either by transurethral resection (TURP) or percutaneous/transrectal needle aspiration.

Case Report▴Top 

A 65-year-old Caucasian gentleman with type II Diabetes Mellitus and a long standing history of psoriasis and psoriatic arthropathy presented to the medical unit with sepsis of unknown origin. He had been on Methotrexate treatment for many years and was recently started on Infliximab infusions which controlled his painful arthropathy. This was later changed to Etanercept because of poor venous access. Since starting the immuno-suppressants he developed a chest infection and also had storage type of LUTS. PSA was normal. Subsequently, after developing signs of recurrent lower urinary tract infections, he was treated in the community with nitrofurantoin for a Staph. aureus urinary infection. Urine cultures for AFB were negative.

Three months later he was admitted on the medical ward with recurrent pyrexia and UTI. Urine culture showed no growth on admission. Although a blood culture on admission showed a first isolation of Staph. aureus, there was no growth after 5 days. He was treated with ciprofloxacin initially, later changed to Daptomycin based on culture report. MRSA was not isolated. After the three episodes of urinary retention and persistent pyrexia despite antibiotics over a period of 4 weeks, he had an abdomino-pelvic CT scan. This showed a large intra-prostatic abscess (Fig. 1), following which a urological opinion was sought. Clinically he had intense perineal discomfort, and on digital rectal examination the prostate felt considerably enlarged and fluctuant. We undertook an urgent trans-urethral resection and de-roofing of this abscess. Copious amount of pus was drained and the patient showed rapid improvement in clinical parameters. Tissue cultures were negative but histology showed xanthogranulomatous prostatitis, without any evidence of malignancy (Fig. 2). Despite good voiding parameters, the post-operative course was delayed by intractable hiccoughs; no cause was found despite thorough investigations. Another scan undertaken during this period showed complete resolution of the prostatic abscess (Fig. 3).

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. Prostatic abscess: appearance on CT prior to trans-urethral resection and drainage in coronal (a), sagittal (b), and transverse (c) sections.

Figure 2.
Click for large image
Figure 2. Histological features of Xanthogranulomatous prostatitis from the resected specimen showing fat-laden macrophages.

Figure 3.
Click for large image
Figure 3. CT appearance after resolution of abscess.

A few weeks later patient again presented with UTIs, and left testicular pain and swelling, with urine cultures showing Staph. aureus, (MRSA not seen). Flow rates were non-obstructed. After a couple of weeks of ineffective antibiotic therapy and further aggravation of his painful, swollen left testis, he underwent a left orchidectomy, following which his symptoms resolved. Histology of the testis showed acute and chronic inflammation with fibrosis. No evidence of malignancy or xanthogranulomatous inflammation was seen.

Discussion▴Top 

Xanthogranulomatous inflammation in the genito-urinary tract

Xanthogranulomatous inflammation, seen more commonly in other organs such as kidneys and gall bladders is rarely seen in the prostate. Prostatic abscess resulting as a result of xanthogranulomatous prostatitis is even more uncommon: so far only one case has been reported in the literature [2]. Different types of granulomatous inflammation have been described but the exact aetiology of xanthogranulomatous prostatitis is unknown. There are isolated case reports of simultaneous xanthogranulomatous inflammatory affections of kidneys and prostate [3].

In some cases the differential diagnosis could include prostate cancer [4-6]. Diffusion weighted MRI scan appearances of prostatic abscesses have been described; although the clinical implication in treatment of large abscesses appears to be limited, its use in differentiating smaller lesions mimicking prostate cancer may be of some use [7].

Xanthogranulomatous orchitis has been reported in literature [8]; with one report of orchitis following intravesical BCG for bladder cancer [9]. Xanthogranulomatous funiculitis and epididymitis have been reported to be rare [10]; one case report mentions evidence of colonies of actinomyces [11]. Differential diagnosis would include other lesions rich in macrophages, such as malakoplakia. In our case, the patient subsequently developed epididymo-orchitis, but the histological findings showed fibrosis due to acute and chronic inflammation only.

There are reports of urinary bladder involvement [12] and rare reports of similar lesions affecting corpus cavernosum [13]. Fistula formation has been reported as a complication of xanthogranulomatous inflammation in the kidney [14], as well as after TURP of a previously undiagnosed xanthogranulomatous prostatitis [15]. Female genito-urinary organs may also be affected [16].

Prostatic abscess

It was believed that prostatic abscesses had become uncommon due to increased use of antibiotics and decreased incidence of gonococcal infections [17, 18]. However, in patients with diabetes, chronic renal failure, and those with immunosuppression, this diagnosis should be always borne in mind [19], in the event of non-resolution of a urological sepsis. Transrectal prostatic biopsies, instrumentation of lower urinary tract, community acquired MRSA infections are important likely causes leading to a change in the aetiology of prostatic abscess compared to a couple of decades ago [20, 21]. The causative organism could be E. coli, staph aureus, but community acuired MRSA have been increasingly reported in recent times [21, 22]. In our patient, the likely contributing factors were diabetes, use of immuno-suppressants as well as repeated urethral catheterisation.

Clinical examination, TRUS [23], MRI and CT scans can all be helpful in confirming the anatomical extent of the diagnosis, however prompt drainage of the abscess either by transurethral route or percutaneous/transrectal route is essential for rapid resolution of the associated morbidity. Most series of prostatic abscesses described in the literature have cited drainage of scant amounts of pus. In our case, copious amount of pus was drained; this may have been due to the fact that the diagnosis was made after 4 weeks of presentation with signs of sepsis. Probably an earlier urological referral might have led to a more expeditious diagnosis and resolution.

As far as route of drainage of prostatic abscess is concerned, one study has compared the efficacy of transurethral drainage with percutaneous drainage [24] and found a 22% incidence of recurrence of the abscess with the latter approach. However, in their large series of 62 cases over a 16 year period, by Meshref et al have reported effective use of Trans-Rectal Ultrasound (TRUS) in helping to drain these abscesses under local anaesthesia [23]. Another study cites the use of transrectal, wide bore needle aspiration using a proctoscope and simultaneous urethroscopic viewing [19]. Conservative management has a much worse outcome and antibiotics alone should not be relied upon for treatment.

Conclusion

It is generally acknowledged that drainage of prostatic abscesses can be done either by transurethral resection or by transrectal route, supplemented by appropriate antibiotic therapy. The exact method of drainage would be decided by the patient’s age, symptoms and the size and location of abscess(es).

Xanthogranulomatous prostatitis is a benign but uncommon condition; and prostatic abscess occurring as a result is even rare. There is as yet no evidence of exact aetiology of this type of inflammation affecting various organs of the body, and immunosuppression, diabetes, chronic renal failure have been reported to be important pre-disposing factors. It has to be remembered that lesions due to xanthogranulomatous inflammation may mimic malignancy in the prostate and other genito-urinary organs.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.


References▴Top 
  1. Cozzutto C, Carbone A. The xanthogranulomatous process. Xanthogranulomatous inflammation. Pathol Res Pract. 1988;183(4):395-402.
    doi
  2. Valsangkar RS, Singh DP, Gaur DD. Xanthogranulomatous prostatitis: Rare presentation of rare disease. Indian J Urol. 2012;28(2):204-205.
    doi pubmed
  3. Tobian AA, Ober SK. Dual perinephric and prostatic abscesses from methacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. South Med J. 2007;100(5):515-516.
    doi
  4. Srigley JR. Benign mimickers of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2004;17(3):328-348.
    doi pubmed
  5. Lee HY, Kuo YT, Tsai SY, Li CC, Wu WJ, Huang CH, Juan YS. Xanthogranulomatous prostatitis: a rare entity resembling prostate adenocarcinoma with magnetic resonance image picture. Clin Imaging. 2012;36(6):858-860.
    doi pubmed
  6. Murugan P, Brown RE, Zhao B. Nonspecific granulomatous prostatitis with prostatic adenocarcinoma. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010;53(1):152-154.
    doi pubmed
  7. Singh P, Yadav MK, Singh SK, Lal A, Khandelwal N. Case series: Diffusion weighted MRI appearance in prostatic abscess. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2011;21(1):46-48.
    doi pubmed
  8. Al-Said S, Ali A, Alobaidy AK, Mojeeb E, Al-Naimi A, Shokeir AA. Xanthogranulomatous orchitis: review of the published work and report of one case. Int J Urol. 2007;14(5):452-454.
    doi pubmed
  9. Hill JR, Gorgon G, Wahl SJ, Armenakas NA, Fracchia JA. Xanthogranulomatous orchitis in a patient with a history of instrumentation and bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy. Urology. 2008;72(2):461 e411-463.
  10. Kang TW, Lee KH, Piao CZ, Yun KJ, Joo HJ, Park KS, Choi YD, et al. Three cases of xanthogranulomatous epididymitis caused by E. coli. J Infect. 2007;54(2):e69-73.
    doi pubmed
  11. Nistal M, Gonzalez-Peramato P, Serrano A, Regadera J. Xanthogranulomatous funiculitis and orchiepididymitis: report of 2 cases with immunohistochemical study and literature review. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128(8):911-914.
    pubmed
  12. Fornari A, Dambros M, Teloken C, Hartmann AA, Kolling J, Seben R. A case of xanthogranulomatous cystitis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18(10):1233-1235.
    doi pubmed
  13. Seo Y, 3rd, Jo HJ, Rim JS. Xanthogranulomatous inflammation of corpus cavernosum. J Sex Med. 2007;4(6):1763-1765.
    doi pubmed
  14. Majeed HA, Mohammed KA, Salman HA. Renocolic fistula as a complication to xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Singapore Med J. 1997;38(3):116-119.
    pubmed
  15. Zaber K, Al-Bareeq R. Xanthogranulomatous prostatitis causing entero-vesical fistula. Bahrain Medical Bulletin. 2004;26(4) pp 165-166.
  16. Ladefoged C, Lorentzen M. Xanthogranulomatous inflammation of the female genital tract. Histopathology. 1988;13(5):541-551.
    doi pubmed
  17. Jacobsen JD, Kvist E. Prostatic abscess. A review of literature and a presentation of 5 cases. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1993;27(2):281-284.
    pubmed
  18. Dajani AM, O'Flynn JD. Prostatic abscess. A report of 25 cases. Br J Urol. 1968;40(6):736-739.
    doi pubmed
  19. Ali E, Badr M, Nafadi M. A retrospective study of 14 cases diagnosed with prostatic abscess. European urology. 2003;2(1):16.
    doi
  20. Flannery MT, Humphrey D. Case report of a prostatic abscess with a review of the literature. Case Rep Med. 2012;2012:430657.
  21. Pierce JR, Jr., Saeed Q, Davis WR. Prostatic abscess due to community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Med Sci. 2008;335(2):154-156.
    doi pubmed
  22. Park SC, Lee JW, Rim JS. Prostatic abscess caused by community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Urol. 2011;18(7):536-538.
    doi pubmed
  23. Meshref A, Aboul-Ela A, Torky M, Morsy A. The role of TRUS in the diagnosis and management of prostatic abscess. European urology Supplements. 2007;6(2):70.
    doi
  24. Lee SH, Park KK, Chung MS, Han HH, Lee DH, Chung BH. Comparison of prostatic abscess treatment: is transurethral resection of prostatic abscess more effective than needle aspiration? European urology Supplements. 2011;10(2):193-194.
    doi


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


World Journal of Nephrology and Urology is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

     

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 

 

 

 

World Journal of Nephrology & Urology, quarterly, ISSN 1927-1239 (print), 1927-1247 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.wjnu.org   editorial contact: editor@wjnu.org    elmer.editorial@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada
© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.